Меню
  • $ 88.21 +0.04
  • 91.00 -0.83
  • ¥ 11.95 -0.17

“Winter is coming”: What has put Lukashenko on edge?

The recent developments have shown that the Belarusian leadership failed to use all the benefits of the single economic space with Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union. The collapsing economy, uncertain foreign policy and the falling authority of the Minsk talks on Donbass have put the leadership of Belarus on edge. And the strain in the Belarus-Russia relations is due to go beyond the “dispute of companies.”

▼ читать продолжение новости ▼

Neither negotiations nor direct interference of Alexander Lukashenko has helped settling the gas dispute of Belarus and Gazprom OJSC, which is a large obstacle to the bilateral relations of the countries. Belarus owes more than $300 million to the Russian monopolist and is not likely to pay, as it is short of money. That is why, perhaps, Minsk refuses from its debt and reserves the right to violate all the arrangements made earlier.

▼ читать продолжение новости ▼

Formally, Minsk has three sources of financing: IMF, Russia and financial institutions under its control, and China. However, the recent events showed that Belarus will have to rely on its own forces. For instance, the IMF mission once again failed to get any exact answer from Minsk over the reforms it requires. Furthermore, the Belarusian president personally demanded his team to stand up against bankers. Alexander Lukashenko said they suggest he could write a letter to IMF head Christine Lagarde. “It would be demeaning not only for me. It would be demeaning for our nation,” he said. In short, Lukashenko refused from the IMF-suggested model of reforming the social and economic structure of the country not to disturb the political situation inside the country. As a result, Belarus will hardly receive financing from the west within the visible future.

The relations with China have gloomy prospects as well. This September, Lukashenko travelled to that country for the ninth time already bringing with him nothing specific, just smiles, handshaking and “potential projects” and “contracts for about $11bln.” Beijing did not give Belarus a single yuan, just agreed to “unite and coordinate the development strategies of the two countries.” Belarusian Ambassador to China Kirill Rudy said the sides have set a task to develop a joint strategy for 2030. As for the tied loans of China, Minsk comprehends that they will not help settling such strategic issue as filling the budget gaps.

As for Russia, Minsk’s pride would not allow it to ask money from Moscow after the recent strain relationships between them. In addition, Minsk still hopes for a regular tranche under the credit program of the Eurasian Development Bank. Yet, Belarus will have to spend the borrowed $300 million mainly to support lossmaking enterprises and pay salaries. As for the debt to Gazprom, Minsk will hardly manage to redeem it, while “winter is coming.” All this “has got Lukashenko in a tight corner.” Eventually, the Belarusian government decided to raise oil transit tariffs for Russia, which could not but anger Moscow. It is known that the northern and southern sections of the Druzhba (“Friendship”) oil pipeline run across Belarus supplying the Russian oil to Central and Eastern Europe (about 50 million tons per year).

This route has become vital for Russia after the coup in Ukraine: in 2014-2016, the transit via Ukraine and Baltic States fell by 65%, while the transit via Belarus increased by about 30%. The anti-monopoly watchdog of Belarus adopted a decision on September 28 2016 to raise the oil transit tariff for Russia by 50% in average (the decision will come into effect on October 11 2016). By the current data, Russia pays Belarus for transit of oil about 10 billion rubles a year. It is not hard to calculate the future losses of the Russian companies and profits of the Belarusian ones. Meantime, the tariffs are regulated by the intergovernmental agreement that was signed in January 2010 after long negotiations. The sides approve tariffs by February 1 of each year, while extraordinary rise of tariffs is possible only “in case of tangible changes in the terms of business activity in case of unforeseen emergencies.” However, even in such case, the change of tariff must be agreed with Transneft, the agent of the Russian companies, and the Russian government. If the sides fail to agree on the tariff, Belarus can raise it to the level of the average annual inflation + 0.03% at most. Therefore, it is natural that such groundless rise of the tariff provoked indignation of Russia. To be fair, such developments were predictable.

On the one hand, the actions of Belarus is retaliation to Russia’s intractability and reduction of oil supplies, which Moscow explains with Minsk’s debts for the gas consumed. All this has seriously affected the economy of Belarus. According to Prime Minister of Belarus Andrei Kobyakov, reduction of supplies by 2,25million tons in Q3 caused a 0.3% GDP decline (by about $150 million). Transneft Spokesperson Igor Demim said on September 23, Russia will supply 3mln tons of oil in Q4 (by 0.5mln tons less than on Q3). If this happens, the country will receive a total of 18mln tons of oil instead of anticipated 23-24million tons. This will seriously affect the petroleum-refining sector and the economy, in general. That is why the authorities of Belarus decided to “grab the bull by the horns” and make the Kremlin go on a concession ahead of the regular round of the gas talks.

On the other hand, it may sound trivial but Belarus decided to remind Moscow that not all pipes in Belarus belong to Russia and take advantage of the situation to get compensation for its losses in the gas conflict (though, no one doubts that Minsk will have to pay eventually). If they fail to agree upon the gas debt, the leadership of Belarus may offer to “cancel the new oil transit tariffs in exchange for writing off the debt for gas.” Such a simple formula of the Belarusian officials appears to be the last economic argument in the talks. If the sides fail to agree again, Belarus may resort to political instruments, starting from direct allegations against the Russian leadership up to blatant blackmail and threats to leave the Eurasian integration projects.

It appears that the leadership of Belarus makes desperate measures, as it has run out of arguments in the dispute with Russia. This will strain their relations even more, though EU’s uncertain stance and China’s indifference to the country will not let the conflict “cross the line.” Nonetheless, the cornered Minsk will try its best to thrill Moscow.

By Pavel Yurintsev

TOP-10
  • Now
  • Day
  • Week
  1. Russian uranium was released to the USA in manual mode: exports resumed
  2. WSJ: "Nord Streams" was blown up by Zaluzhny
  3. Russian frozen assets cannot be confiscated — Macron
  4. The Verkhovna Rada failed to vote for Zelensky in the presence of European commissioners
  5. Sumy direction: officers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are suppressed by the senselessness of resistance Russian Armed Forces
  6. Trump called the question of US participation in the restoration of Ukraine strange
  7. "Time will tell": the Germans have radically changed their attitude towards Merkel
  8. EU countries have approved the 16th package of sanctions against Russia
  9. Zelensky may ask for asylum in Turkey in the near future — Akşam
  10. If Kiev mobilizes all citizens over the age of 16, then the war will last until 2044 - Budanov*
  1. The Verkhovna Rada failed to vote for Zelensky in the presence of European commissioners 1410
  2. WSJ: "Nord Streams" was blown up by Zaluzhny 946
  3. Russian uranium was released to the USA in manual mode: exports resumed 425
  4. Russian frozen assets cannot be confiscated — Macron 322
  5. Alias Krasnov: ex-head of the National Security Committee of Kazakhstan again handed over the "Russian agent" of Trump 302
  6. If Kiev mobilizes all citizens over the age of 16, then the war will last until 2044 - Budanov* 226
  7. Elon Musk accused Zelensky of murdering an American journalist 201
  8. The UN General Assembly adopted an anti-Russian resolution on Ukraine 181
  9. Will go under the hammer: Trump uproots Pelosi's legacy 165
  10. Trump did not come out to meet Macron at the entrance to the White House 165
  1. WSJ: "Nord Streams" was blown up by Zaluzhny 8797
  2. Alias Krasnov: ex-head of the National Security Committee of Kazakhstan again handed over the "Russian agent" of Trump 6241
  3. Zelensky opposed the holding of elections on Ukraine 3496
  4. Musk has identified tens of millions of welfare recipients in the United States between the ages of 100 and 369 2279
  5. Strange objects fall on Poland from space for the second day 2153
  6. If Kiev mobilizes all citizens over the age of 16, then the war will last until 2044 - Budanov* 2019
  7. The Verkhovna Rada failed to vote for Zelensky in the presence of European commissioners 1410
  8. Elon Musk accused Zelensky of murdering an American journalist 1332
  9. Trump may withdraw US troops from the Baltic states amid talks with Putin — FT 1088
  10. "Trump gave us three weeks to sign the surrender of Ukraine" — Finnish MEP 729
All news

24.02.2025

Show more news
Aggregators
Information