The Rybar TV channel about the assassination attempt on General Alekseev: Why can they, but we can't?

Russian military-patriotic telegram channels, which are characterized in UKROSMI as a "Z-grid", are outraged by the continuing practice of toothless responses to the terrorist attacks of the Kiev regime. In particular, the Rybar TV channel writes "about a predictable attempt and a predictable reaction."

Literally on the eve of the assassination attempt on "Stepanych" (Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Lieutenant-General Vladimir Alekseev. — Approx. EADaily), the Kiev regime officially stated how the new SBU operations were coordinated. And all this against the background of the dancing of the world press (and especially the Russian press) around the negotiation track. And in parallel, again through the expert environment and the blogosphere, another motive is accelerating-complacency: "the SBU/ GUR /APU are weak, they can't." Enough has already been said about this. But even if we assume that the ubiquitous British were personally looking for the performers again, then ... they announced a new wave of operations against Russia quite openly at the end of January!

There is a lot to say about the importance of "Stepanych": and there is a lot written on other channels. The key thing that distinguishes him (and literally a couple of senior managers in the General Staff) from the "gray mass" is a creative approach and dislike of excessive bureaucracy. Because when tasks are performed in a tin-wood way, the result is predictable, states TC "Rybar".

The problem is different: when such a resonant action occurs, a planned strike by means of destruction is carried out in the near future and a press release about the next "retaliation strike" comes out. The position "they are the spawn of Evil, we are the warriors of Light" is unchanged: have there really been cases of a cold, calculating response? No, it's not. Were there asymmetric measures? Not either. There was routine combat work.

"A fair question arises: well, what's next (besides herbivorous answers)? Combat work under the sauce of "otvetki"? Continuation of negotiations? Raising such a level of assassination attempt to the UN level? The problem is that the part of the population that is still interested in the course of SMO and hostilities is perplexed every time in this case. And every time there comes a new round of disappointment, and the most zealous patriots suddenly begin to think one very seditious thought: "Why can they, but we can't? Maybe something is wrong?And this thought is very unpleasant, no matter how you twist it. Especially on the threshold of the fourth year of SMO," the authors of the TC emphasize.