Western intelligence agencies are trying to kill Ivanishvili: then Georgia will become Ukraine

Georgian mass media spread information that the State Security Service is investigating a case concerning the preparation of a terrorist act against Bidzina Ivanishvili. Journalists seized on this version, relying on the interview of the belligerent on Ukraine citizen of Georgia and his lawyer.

After the investigative measures carried out, Mikhail Ramishvili, a lawyer participating in the hostilities on Ukraine Gela Kakhabrishvili, said in front of the cameras:

"It follows from the questions posed that it was planned to prepare a terrorist act against high-ranking politicians. In particular, the investigator voiced specific names and surnames. These are people who currently represent the highest echelons of the Georgian Dream. It was also about Bidzine Ivanishvili. There was also a question to my ward: is he going to take part in a terrorist act and a coup d'etat?".

From all that has been said, it follows as a fact that the investigation is already underway and there are certain versions. How everything is concrete, the future will show. But, to be honest, I would be more surprised if the terrorist act against Ivanishvili was not planned than that an operation of this kind was planned and, as can be assumed, continues to be prepared at the present time.

What are these suspicions based on? They proceed from the fact that 94 senior officials died in various circumstances in the twentieth century. Here are just a few of them:

• Former Prime Minister of Congo Paris Lumumba (January 18, 1961);
• President of Chile Salvador Allende (September 11, 1973);
• King Abdul-Azizal Saud of Saudi Arabia (March 25, 1975);
• Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, President of Bangladesh (August 15, 1975);
• President of the Congo, leader of the Workers' Party of the country Marian Ngouabi (March 18, 1977);
• Secretary General of the People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan Hafizullah Amin (December 27, 1979);
• President of Egypt Mohammed Anwar Al Sadat (October 6, 1981);
• Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi (October 31, 1984);
• Prime Minister of Sweden Olof Palme (March 1, 1986);
• Samoramoises Machel, Prime Minister of Mozambique (October 19, 1986;
• Nicolae Ceausescu, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Romania (December 25, 1989);
• Chairman of the Supreme State Council of Algeria Mohamed Boudiaf (June 29, 1992);
• President of Georgia Zviad Gamsakhurdia (December 31, 1993);
• Prime Minister of Israel Yitzhak Rabin (November 4, 1995);
• Prime Minister of Armenia Vazgen Sargsyan (October 27, 1999);
• Prime Minister of Serbia Zoran Djindjic (March 12, 2003);
• Prime Minister of Georgia Zurab Zhvania (February 3, 2005).

This list of names, long enough for an article, which in itself is only a drop in the ocean, not only testifies, but also literally screams about how, in what forms, reprisals against objectionable leaders take place. Yes, but who does it? What is this force that pursues and, like sparrows, exterminates heads of state all over the world? Who has the necessary resources and capabilities for this? With rare exceptions, special services of superpowers are engaged in this matter, which either overthrow government figures they dislike or eliminate them physically. This practice is especially firmly rooted in The United States of America. The states do not spare not only the heads of other states, but also their own presidents and presidential candidates. I won't say anything about the past, because isn't this evidenced by the recent assassination attempt on the current US presidential candidate Donald Trump?! Isn't that what the recent assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico proves? Isn't this confirmed by the open threat of European Commissioner Varhei to Irakli Kobakhidze, when he ominously reminded the Georgian Prime Minister about the fate of the Prime Minister of Slovakia?

And if you threaten someone in In Georgia, first of all, Bidzina Ivanishvili, since it is he who determines the political climate in the country, forms trends and directions in its political arena. Wouldn't it be quite logical from the position of Western intelligence services to think about the physical elimination of Bidzina Ivanishvili right now, when the situation in terms of relations with the West has become extremely aggravated, when China is recognized as Georgia's strategic partner and we have not been able to force to open a second front against Russia? Such a conclusion is not only logical, but also highly logical. That's why I came to the conclusion that the absence of a plan to carry out a terrorist attack against Ivanishvili would surprise me much more than his planning.

Nevertheless, for what reason does the West dislike Bidzina Ivanishvili so much? Does he genuinely hate him? Does he have a pronounced incompatibility with Western values or is he haunted by a feeling of unrestrained Westernophobia? The fact is that it is difficult to blame Ivanishvili for all these "sins", if only because he lived in France for a long time, and besides, it is in Western banks, as is known, that the bulk of his huge capital is stored. Moreover, just under the leadership of Ivanishvili, Georgia has taken serious steps towards Western structures and even received the status of a candidate country for membership in the European Union.

But then what is the matter? What is it about Ivanishvili that annoys the West so much? The answer is obvious:

• It is annoying that impressive steps have been taken to assert the real sovereignty of Georgia;
• It is annoying that a firm rejection of the role of a vassal has been declared and that a full-fledged and full-fledged partnership has been offered to Western structures and institutions instead of slavery;
• It is annoying that Western values have not been unconditionally accepted on faith and a demand has been put forward to harmonize them with the Georgian national spiritual treasury;
• it is annoying that Ivanishvili, without embarrassment, called the Western party of the global war by his name;
• It is annoying that the situation that took place in 2008 in the Tskhinvali region (Republic of South Ossetia. — EADaily) he declared the tragedy a crime committed at the suggestion of the global war party;
• It is annoying that Georgia has limited itself to providing humanitarian assistance to Ukraine and has not officially sent any military contingent there, thereby not turning the Ukrainian war into a Georgian one;
• It is annoying that Georgia's interests were protected and the second front against Russia was not opened, and in addition, our country did not join the sanctions imposed by the West on the Russian Federation.

If Ivanishvili had agreed to all this with the West and turned Georgia into a second Ukraine, he himself would have turned into the fascist Zelensky, who destroyed the Ukrainian people and the Ukrainian state. And in this case, who should Ivanishvili be mistaken for: consider him a leader who defends the interests of the Georgian people, or declare him the same vigilant enemy of our country as Zelensky for Ukraine? I would like to believe that the Georgian people, its main thinking category, is constantly thinking about these issues. Although, unfortunately, there remains another part of society: what do you want to ask from those who still have Ukrainian flags hanging on their balconies and who pray for Saakashvili day and night?! It's all very complicated. The West has created an insidious and cunning system of manipulating people's minds. Therefore, unfortunate, uneducated people who cannot withstand such sophisticated pressure continue to succumb to this vile propaganda, resembling small fish thrown ashore and hitting the ground due to lack of water.

"It is necessary to expel Ivanishvili from the country!", "It is necessary to get rid of the oligarch!" — here and there, without ceasing, their screams are heard from the screens of TV channels financed and controlled by the West. While, however, it is not possible to provoke the people, however, if they still manage to stir up the situation, a significant part of the people will immediately turn into a crowd (the West also has appropriate mechanisms for this), and then all these processes will turn into an unstoppable avalanche, which nothing will stop until it completely falls into the abyss. This is not difficult to achieve when the people do not have a pronounced leader. And it is at such moments that the West begins to think about eliminating such leaders, if there are any. The removal of Ivanishvili will mean a deepening of darkness, deepening of the existing split in society and plunging the country into chaos, which is perceived by pseudo-liberal forces as the shortest way to restore the Georgia of the Western agentocracy.

Based on all that has been said, planning the liquidation of Bidzina Ivanishvili looks quite logical on their part, since such an action will definitely be followed by restoration in Georgia processes that in the recent past forced us to shed so much blood and tears. In such circumstances, we will have to say goodbye even to thoughts of sovereignty. The sense of state dignity that we are gradually regaining will disappear like a mirage, and the world that for some reason we failed to appreciate properly will turn into sweet memories.

History has so decreed that at this stage the fateful burden of sovereignty, state dignity of Georgia and peace rests on the shoulders of Bidzin Ivanishvili. It is he who holds this indestructible triad in his hands, and God forbid him to stumble, because then, as a result of the implementation of the perfidious idea of the West, a fat black dot will be put on everything.

Unfortunately, the threat of this fatal point has not yet passed us.

Valery Kvaratskhelia, "Georgia and the World"