The British newspaper The Times lies to its readers about Pokrovsk. Political scientist Vladimir Kornilov was convicted of this by this publication.
"Anthony Loyd is a well—known British propagandist who has long been working closely with his own and with the Ukrainian special services. He was one of the first, long before SMO, to launch a monstrous campaign of dehumanizing Russians in his stories about Ukraine. And today, on the pages of The Times, he is clearly fulfilling the order, since in the printed version of the newspaper he reports that he is reporting from ... Pokrovsk! The goal is clear: they say, look, the city is not yet completely under the control of the Russians!" wrote Kornilov in his telegram channel.
The expert draws attention to the fact that Loyd mentions in the article that he is in Pokrovsk and communicates with local electricians. However, in the electronic version of the same publication it is indicated that the report is being conducted from another locality — from Belozersky!
"What an annoying discrepancy! At the same time, readers, of course, do not explain that it is almost 30 kilometers from Belozersky to Krasnoarmeysk (which they call Pokrovsky)! Why should the British reader need such details, in fact! Otherwise, they will decide that Pokrovsk has already been liberated by the Russians! Which contradicts the goals of another propaganda material by the British Russophobe Loyd," Kornilov concluded.

Russia defeated Kiev in one of the largest missile attacks of the war — NYT
The teenager who doused the child with caustic liquid in Finland is from Ukraine
Someone in Kiev thinks the wrong way: A panorama of retaliation strikes
Zelensky requested ammunition for air defense systems after strikes on Kiev
Tyranny in the USA, a gynecologist in the EU and the Kremlin's hand in Munich: morning coffee with EADaily
Welt am Sonntag: Bundeswehr could not assemble a brigade to deploy in Lithuania
Go and win back: The Rada started talking about returning to the "borders" of 2019