Donald Trump's victory: who is "behind him" and what will happen now?

Donald Trump's victory in the US presidential election has become a major global event. Who knows, maybe someday, and it is possible that soon enough, it will be called historical. It is no coincidence that elections in other countries, even such large ones as England, France, Germany, as a rule, arouse keen interest only among the citizens of these countries and, despite all the efforts of the "world" press, only briefly attract "international" attention, after which they are quickly forgotten, and for the current American Almost the whole world followed the elections with great genuine interest. Of course, this is due to the fact that the USA is the leader of modern civilization, and their policies have a significant impact on almost all processes taking place in the world. But it's not just that. No less, and perhaps even more important, is something else, namely the identity of the winner — the main "newsmaker" of this year, the "new old" President Donald Trump.

After all, it's obvious that Harris won (haven't you forgotten who it is yet?) not even close to having such a worldwide resonance, let alone becoming a real event. No, of course, the "world" media would have driven the wave, would have blown into victorious fanfare, the progressive world community would have expressed a sense of deep satisfaction and leftists of all stripes would have gone wild with joy. But, all this would subside and be forgotten very quickly. But Trump's victory is quite another matter. It is obviously just the beginning, the starting point for the start of big changes, changes that are clearly demanded by the hearts of the majority of the American people. And the fact that the majority voted for Trump is an immutable, documented arithmetic fact. But what is surprising is that for many "Americanists" and other "analytical scientists" who appear in the media explaining the reasons for the victory of the Republican leader, this fact recedes, for some reason, into the background, turns out to be almost insignificant.

And it is not clear whether the fact of Trump's victory does not suit them, or whether they are at odds with arithmetic, but what they have not told about — first of all, of course, (with Marxist greetings) about "corporate profits": oil, automotive, military-industrial and others. And the most intelligent, advanced and dedicated ones have revealed that everything is the case, it turns out that the "mafia of technocrats" is behind Trump. So they cut the "mother truth" straight from the shoulder, - "Trump is just a facade for the mafia," and for proof the Mask was cited as an example. It was not without this, and without hints of the "Israeli lobby", which Trump will have to thank. And others explained in detail that it was mainly due to the mistakes of the Democrats who had a bad election campaign (and in these explanations, sometimes almost undisguised regret could be seen) — and the stubborn Biden was replaced late, Harris had little time for promotion; and this latter did not work very well — she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time, then she laughed at the wrong time. in front of journalists, she was hiding, etc., etc.

In general, they talked a lot about this and that, but for some reason they didn't say only about what the American people saw in the Trump is his true national leader, defender of American freedom and national tradition. But this, in fact, is evidenced not by the "analytical", but by the arithmetic results of the vote. The "deep people" voted for Trump, the salt of the American earth, people who believe in God and traditional values, who do not rely on "benefits" or "research" grants and "star" fees, but are able and accustomed to creating well-being for themselves and their families with their own hands, and want a normal human future for their children. Trump belongs to these people, that's why he won — this is the fundamental reason. And for the same reason, Trump, we note, the only one of the leaders of the "democratic" countries, really elected by the people, is hated by the "world" media, trying to discredit his personality, and belittle his victory, revealing its "behind-the-scenes" factors.

Meanwhile, if hatred and envy do not obscure the eyes, it is not difficult to see that there is nothing "behind the scenes" in Trump's victory, its reasons are easily explained without any pseudo-scientific stupidity, "insiders" and "conspiracy theories." Yes, it is quite obvious that today, not only in "undemocratic" countries, but also in the West, including the United States, the support of the people is far from enough for an "out-of-system" candidate to officially win the election. It is also necessary to have at least one, and preferably two conditions at once: firstly, the neutralization of administrative resources and ensuring fair vote counting; and, secondly, a more or less significant split in the ruling elite. And Trump, for whom this election campaign has already become the third, perfectly understood the need for the first condition. The 2020 elections, when he was openly, simply "brazenly" robbed of victory, obviously saved him from the remnants of political naivety with which he came to the White House in 2016.

In 2020, the functionaries of the "deep state", which controls the electoral machine of the two—party system, did not bother much with "political technologies" - state and municipal employees, in "cooperation" with well-paid democratic activists, simply "sent" ballots until the desired result was obtained. They were not even embarrassed by the fact that they had to show the highest percentage of participation in the last 120 years (!), and by the fact that compared to the last elections, the turnout increased by 11.2%, which probably never happened in American history, and in the history of other "democratic" countries too. They fought back by the fact that, they say, "it has not been proven" that "the courts rejected the claims," as if sometime, somewhere, the winners of the elections admitted that they had won due to fraud. And it doesn't matter that over the previous 50 years the average turnout in the elections was 54-55%, and the maximum 58.2% (made for Obama in 2008), which was already a record achievement, is 3-5% more than usual, and in 2020, according to the counted ballots, "suddenly" 66.9%, which is statistically unreliable, and from the point of view of probability theory, to put it mildly, it is unlikely. By the way, in the current elections, with the increased interest of citizens in the most acute principled confrontation, as everyone says in one voice, the turnout was only about 60% (exact figures are still not calculated), i.e. 7% less than in the 2020 elections, which obviously also speaks about their "honesty". Such is the anti-democratic arithmetic of the American elections.

But Trump learned his lesson well, and this time the voting process was watched, as he said, by "thousands of lawyers," and of course, many thousands of Republican activists. And, oh, who would have thought — even before November 5, thousands of fake "democratic" ballots were discovered in Pennsylvania, and after polling day, when counting, across the country, several hundred thousand envelopes with "Democratic" ballots and illegible signatures. However, there was quite a "logical explanation" for this — it turns out that these "zoomers" were so fond of computers that, almost like peasants in the 19th century, they didn't really learn how to sign, and besides, they are too lazy to answer phone calls. But in 2024, unlike 2020, such "explanations" did not help much, since in the current elections, the possibilities for unlimited stuffing of fake "democratic votes" were generally significantly limited.

Of course, the functionaries of the "deep state" are not used to electoral fraud, and this time they could try to draft ballots and make big eyes to say, "where's the evidence? Go to court. But it is clear that repeated, quite obvious mass falsification would completely undermine the (and so thoroughly undermined) trust of the "electorate" in the American electoral system, and even worse, in general, trust in modern American "democracy" as a whole, and not only in America, but throughout the world. Moreover, Trump is by no means an "obedient boy" and not a fake candidate "for show", he would never admit fake results. And after all, people have already been brought, and for the second consecutive brazen deception could really bring them to the streets, provoke mass resistance. They would have coped with it, of course, but not without problems, and it is clear that all this, at least, would call into question the very existence of a well-established two-party system for centuries, and this, obviously, is not at all what the gentlemen comrades from the "deep state" need. Therefore, this time, they were forced to abandon open mass falsifications (especially since, as a last resort, a "plan B" was prepared with a "Cossack" sent to Trump). This was the second most important reason for Donald Trump's victory.

Another significant reason, judging, in particular, by the fact that the New York Times (the American equivalent of the Soviet newspaper Pravda, the organ of the CPSU Central Committee) and some other "world" media declared "neutrality" shortly before the elections, is obviously, if not in a split, then in any case In this case, there is a serious aggravation of disagreements among the ruling American "deep state" globalists. The left-wing crypto-socialists of the Trotskyist persuasion, whose nominees were the Clintons, Obama, Biden and Harris, seemed to be in the minority, and the policy of accelerated, open substitution of Wasps, undermining traditional values and destroying production, decided to "adjust" in favor of using softer, indirect, more liberal methods of gradual "reformatting" American society and the state. This is all the more justified because the continuation of the direct destruction of the fundamental institutions of the latter, now that Israel is in dire need of comprehensive American support, may turn out to be very risky.

Therefore, Trump was not particularly prevented from winning. By the way, in this regard, it is possible to draw some analogy with the struggle within the Soviet elite in the 30s of the last century. Then, having in mind the future World War, the "world backstage", without interfering, allowed Stalin to repress the Trotskyist-Leninist guard in order to strengthen the regime of a likely ally on the eve of a clash with Germany. What kind of conflicts the globalists are preparing today can only be assumed. But it is clear that the weakening of American power is now unprofitable for them. So Trump, as is the case with historical figures, just came on time — the stars came together to "make America great again" for a while. That's the whole story about "who is behind Trump." And those who want to know "what will happen now" just need to listen carefully to the American leader himself. He has no "cunning plans", he says what he thinks and does what he says.