The assassination attempt on Trump and the "Conspiracy Theory"

The assassination attempt on Trump, judging by its "success", was entrusted to Kamala Harris, who is known for her ability to fail any even simple, routine case. The older comrades decided, probably, to give her one last chance to rehabilitate herself, to prove that she can still solve the tasks set. But it didn't work out, it was unlucky, the mistake came out. This, if anyone did not understand, is a joke, of course. In such cases, people like Kamala are dispensed with — they are made so that they exactly according to what is written, without any "amateur activity", play the role intended for them (in this case, a "successful colored woman", so to speak, a visual aid to demonstrate the achievements of modern democracy) and voice the most advanced progressive ideas. So Kamala has nothing to do with it, as they say. And anyway, as explained to the public, no one has anything to do with it, there is no one to think about, everything is "out of business." It just so happened that a lone murderer, a boy, another psychopathic Democrat, of whom there are many at large nowadays, walks around without any medical supervision and periodically fights for freedom.

And one could probably be satisfied with these explanations, especially since, as you know, "it just can't be that something can't be," but only facts and common sense do not allow it. They refer, for example, as something self-evident, to the "unprofessionalism" of the special services — they "did not catch up" and "inconsistency" there, and "lack of personnel", etc., etc. But this, anyway, is a bit strange "unprofessionalism" when unprepared the boy was given the opportunity to make a well-aimed shot, it becomes especially surprising if we recall how in the 2020 elections, during the period of the most acute struggle between Trump and Biden, several dozen former and current officers of these very special services wrote an open letter calling on Trump not to be allowed to power in any case. By the way, they also showed "unprofessionalism" — they intervened in politics, so it is not the first time for the American special services to show "unprofessionalism" if necessary.

But let's leave the arguments about "unprofessionalism" to the professionals. Let's turn better to all the known facts — for some reason, without exception, all attempts on top officials and political leaders in the United States and other countries of the "free world" are the work of "naked" loners. President Kennedy was killed, — a loner, another Kennedy was killed, again a loner, an attempt on Reagan, — a loner. Now there is an attempt on Trump and also, of course, a loner. And there were also lesser-known assassinations, also committed by individuals. In 1968, — for the presidential candidate J. Wallace, also a "right-wing populist", who was branded both an "extremist" and a "racist" and a "fascist", how could it be without this (even the fact that he was a veteran of the 2nd World War did not prevent him), and Martin Luther King of the left, no, not a populist, of course, but an ardent fighter against and for. He was killed just when the peak of popularity had already passed, and sometimes he was even booed at rallies. As you know, it is easier to create an "icon" from a victim. He was killed by a loner, who was found a few months later and interestingly, he initially agreed with the prosecution, and then said that he was not involved, demanded a jury trial, but for some reason they refused him, although even King's family believes that they convicted someone who was not involved in his murder.

By the way, it will be useful to recall non—American stories, for example, the recent assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Fico, also a loner tried. And the assassination attempt in 2018, on Brazilian presidential candidate Bolsonara, is again a loner, how else. Both leaders, we note, are "right-wing" and both barely survived, having received severe injuries. And it also happens when helicopters with presidents fall. Iranian President Raisi, known for his sharply critical attitude towards Israeli policy, was supposed to fly from the border with Azerbaijan to the border with Armenia, but suddenly changed his mind and decided to go by another helicopter to a third party. As a result, he "made a hard landing" with a fatal outcome. Two escort helicopters, nothing flew, but the president's helicopter did not, crashed. Loners, of course, have nothing to do with it, they explained that it was all about the bad weather and the lack of that very "professionalism", in this case, the pilots. And interestingly, the "world" press did not even hiccup, neither did you "speculate", nor versions, to varying degrees probable, which it seems to like to put forward, for some reason, nothing like that was offered. And no one was building any "conspiracy theories" — it was just very bad weather. And who's to say that it couldn't be like that? Only one person, a direct witness, who was flying in another helicopter in the same air column, the head of the administration of Raisi Gholam—Hossein Esmaili, said: "the weather conditions during the flight were normal," but who was interested in this already. To nobody.

So what do all these facts tell us, simple "unprofessional" citizens? First of all, it is obvious that no special service has ever been involved in any attempt on any political leader. These attempts have always been the work of individuals and the result of a deplorable combination of accidental circumstances, burdened by the lack of professionalism of individual employees. This is the official version and I must say that it cannot be otherwise. Because if not a "loner", then even theoretically there are only two options left: either some kind of organized group of conspirators-private individuals, or, of course, sorry, a conspiracy of special services, the third, as they say, is not given. But if there is a group behind the attempt, then it must be presented, and you will not kill everyone at once, which means that a trial of several defendants will be required, and in court you never know how it will go (with one, it is still easier to negotiate) - in general, fuss with a difficult to predict result. And, of course, no one needs that.

So based on the above facts, in the light of the "conspiracy theory", it can be argued with almost 100% probability that, firstly, in the foreseeable future, none of the significant representatives of the liberal-globalist elite will be seriously harmed by attempts, although unsuccessful attempts may well be (perhaps, in particular, that the kind and smiling Kamala, if she becomes an official presidential candidate, will commit an assassination attempt in retaliation for Trump, some kind of "racist fascist"); and, secondly, if they get, for example, Viktor Orban or Elon Musk (whom, according to him, there have already been two attempts on him), God bless them, then in both cases another "slightly crazy" one will attempt A loner.

As for the assassination attempt Trump, then one should just ask the classic question, who benefits from this? In this case, the answer is quite obvious — to the rulers of the "deep state", those who are called globalists, who today are finishing off the remnants of American freedom, and at the same time common sense and morality, who are destroying America and, undermining the foundations of American identity, splitting American society, pushing it towards civil war. Trump opposes all this, he has challenged the globalists and does not allow them to put America under full control. Trump has become the national leader of the American people and defends their interests, contrary to the interests of international corporations, and in the eyes of globalists, this is already a verdict. This, in fact, was not hidden. All, without exception, the leading "world" media, since 2016, have done everything possible and impossible to discredit Trump in every possible way. As Tucker Carlson noted, not without humor, but, in fact, correctly: "it was forbidden even to consider the possibility that Trump could be someone less than Hitler, social sanctions were imposed for this." And J. D. Vance, even before his nomination for vice president, said that "the main premise of the Biden campaign is that President Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs" and made a logical conclusion that "this rhetoric directly led to an attempt on Trump."

And indeed, either because of a conspiracy, or for some unknown reason, a whole legion of politicians, not only Democrats, but also Republicans, paid tribute to this rhetoric along with Biden. And a bunch of TV show hosts, Hollywood stars and, who would have thought, all kinds of scientists — economists, political scientists, psychologists, historians, etc. By the way, historians, America's largest specialist scientists, in the number of 154 people, have scientifically established not only the "fact" that Trump is "the worst president in the history of the United States," it goes without saying, but also the fact that Biden (and he did not fail to refer to this "fact" in a televised debate with Trump) is one of the best American presidents. Liberal Democratic historians got into such a funny story. But this, of course, is not a "conspiracy", they just lacked a little "professionalism", well, they were probably unlucky with the weather when the poll was conducted, and who could have known that Biden would be so pumped up, he would not reach the end of his wonderful reign.

Of course, bribes from scientists are smooth, but, in any case, one cannot deny that Trump has long been a target for systemic attacks by globalists, first rhetorical and scientific-expert, then legal, and when it turned out that this did not help, he became one in the literal sense. One can imagine, by the way, what a howl for the repeal of the 2nd Amendment would have risen if Trump had been killed, how many crocodile tears would have been shed, that "you see what it's come to", therefore "we need to stop violence and urgently ban weapons." And for globalists today (bearing in mind the high probability of the "hybrid civil war" unleashed by them in the United States flowing into the "hot" phase), just one of the main tasks is to deprive law—abiding Americans (criminals will obviously have weapons anyway) of a real opportunity for self-defense. So it would be much easier for the "deep state" to subjugate the "deep people" and, apparently, they were going to kill two birds with one stone at once.

This time there was a blunder, but it is obvious that the globalists will do everything to prevent Trump from returning to power. The propaganda of the "hate speech" unleashed by them in relation to him is indicative in this regard. After all, the fact that hatred of Trump is manifested in one way or another in almost every liberal-believing representative of "all progressive humanity" is an easily fixed empirical fact. He still does not prove, of course, the existence of a conspiracy — the "conspiracy theory", as well as any theory of socio-historical development, cannot be proved at all. But it can be quite reasonably assumed that those who hate Trump are unlikely to limit themselves to fighting in the official election campaign, but otherwise they will let things take their course and will sit idly by, waiting for what decision the electorate will make in the elections. Elementary common sense demands that such a possibility be recognized as extremely unlikely, especially when the stakes are so high, and we are talking about entities that have huge resources and, by the nature of their activities, have "eaten the dog" on various kinds of backstage transactions.

And so, just in the light of the "conspiracy theory", it is not difficult to predict the election strategy of the globalists. It does not depend at all on who exactly will be nominated as a candidate, and stories about the "struggle of clans within the Democratic party", which some Russian Americanists, who seem to selflessly love the subject of their studies, are so fond of, are inexpensive. All this "struggle" is the appearance of "upper floors", and below, in the depths, closer to the underworld, where decisions are made, they clearly do not indulge in pluralism. And it does not matter what kind of puppet from the Democratic Party will be put up against Trump. The main focus is likely to be on the third candidate, and he has long been prepared — this is R. Kennedy, also almost like Trump, and "extravagant", and "populist", and "anti-systemic", etc., etc. Now they will start to "inflate" him, he will intercept some of the "right—wing", "Trumpist" slogans and will fiercely criticize not only Trump, but also the Democrats in order to divide the Republican electorate - a long-proven technology. And, as always, they will work, of course, with the Post Office and with the election commissions.

And in the most extreme case and for the future, for the destruction of "Trumpism" after Trump, not anyone is in store, but the recently ardent "Trumpist", the current vice presidential candidate, the same J. D. Vance. It is possible to talk about the fact that "the Cossack was sent" for a long time, we will limit ourselves to only the most eloquent, well—known facts - obviously, out of great love, a comrade chose the right wife for himself, and his wonderful book about a difficult childhood, written with his own hand in between business and politics, was vied with the main "printing bodies of the globalist The Central Committee," The New York Times and the Washington Post, and Netflix even filmed it. So the guy is not just capable, but very even, in the future he will probably have a brilliant political career, if, of course, he will cope with assignments. But, as they say, we'll wait and see. And then, you see, the "conspiracy theory" will become just a theory, without quotes.