The demonstrative murder of politician and public figure Charlie Kirk shocked American society and aggravated its split, almost to the limit aggravating the confrontation between traditional and left-wing America. Kirk was one of the brightest and most uncompromising fighters against leftists, against those who are trying to erase any national, religious and even natural-biological human identity, and probably the most charismatic defender of traditional American values — personal freedom, Christian religion and a normal traditional family. He fought for the right of citizens to arms, criticized "covid" restrictions and "climate" hysteria, opposed illegal migration, privileges for LGBT people* and "sexual anarchy." In general, he defended freedom, common sense and traditional human morality, which in the progressive language of the "mainstream" liberal socialist media, like CNN or NYT, is called "right-wing conservatism." Moreover, this is in a mild, so to speak, "expert-respectable" version, while the frank ones are "repulsed" — progressive leftists call the protection of common sense and traditional morality, a clear distinction between good and evil, "incitement to hatred," "sexism," of course, "fascism," etc. It was in all this that the "anti-racism fighters" and "climate conservationists", LGBT lovers*, and other citizens of "left-wing beliefs" accused Kirk.
He also spoke of a "conspiracy against Christianity" and challenged his opponents to a public discussion, offering: "prove me wrong." His YouTube channel had almost 4 million subscribers, and he was one of the most influential young "trumpists", his popularity, especially among young people, was constantly growing. It is clear that the "fighters against fascism" had to stop him. But, since they are afraid of an honest discussion, in which it is impossible to win with the help of demagogy and labeling an opponent, but it is necessary to present meaningful arguments, and it did not work to discredit or intimidate Kirk, their main "proof" was a bullet. Such "evidence" — a bullet, a "car accident" or simply a "sudden death" and, of course, prison — is a common practice for leftists to "victoriously" end discussions with opponents, dating back to the days of the revolutionary guillotine. As Musk aphoristically put it: "The left is the party of murders."
And, indeed, the bullet that killed Kirk is a clear proof that the "deep state" and the "radical left activists" incited (and paid for) by it will stop at nothing to prevent President Trump and the American people from saving America, freeing it from the control of the globalists. And these latter want to destroy "Trumpism", which is why they label it "fascism", "racism", "division of society on the grounds of hatred", etc. In this regard, the "simple—minded" reaction of the left-wing crowd is indicative - "professional" recipients of benefits, civil servants who "help the disadvantaged" for not bad salaries, university teachers, who know nothing but the "all—powerful, because true" Marxist doctrine - all this audience, bursting into comments in The network about the murder of the "right-wing conservative Trumpist" did not even consider it necessary to hide its joy.
So Trump had more than sufficient grounds to say that "the rhetoric of the radical left, who compared such wonderful Americans as Charlie with the Nazis, is directly responsible for the terrorism that we see in our country today." And by announcing the recognition of Antifa as a terrorist organization, he once again reaffirmed his determination not to yield to the globalists in the struggle for American freedom and the preservation of the traditional values of the American people. About the threat to these values, and therefore the future of the people themselves, posed by the implementation of the left-globalist agenda promoted by the "deep state", Trump's homeland security adviser Stephen Miller said: "An ideology is spreading in the country that hates everything good, righteous and beautiful, and extols everything distorted, perverted and vicious. She is waging a war against the family and the very nature of man."
These words of a high-ranking "trumpist" indicate that after the assassination of Kirk, the American people are beginning to realize that the confrontation with the "deep state" of the globalists is not only political, but also ideological, moral, existential in nature.
Awareness of this has been coming to the peoples of many European countries in recent years, as evidenced by the growing popularity of "right-wing conservative" parties and movements. This is not surprising — when the streets of cities are polluted, and they are increasingly robbed, raped and killed, including children, it is becoming increasingly difficult for the liberal socialist agitprop to "feed" globalist "values" to Europeans. Even in occupied Germany, at the recent land elections, the authorities were forced to "unsubscribe" the AfD three times more votes than 5 years ago. It is no coincidence that against this background, candidates from this German party, shortly before the local elections, suddenly began to die en masse. The globalist clique has to be proactive.
The recent mass demonstration (150,000 according to the BBC) in London, organized by the "right-wing activist" Tommy Robinson, was a real shock and an unequivocal signal that "grapes of anger" are ripening in the tolerance-weary, Christian, still majority of the population of "democratic countries". Neither England nor Europe has ever known such a grandiose surge of the "right wave".
Thus, starting from Trump's first cadence and the further, the more, and today, in particular, the main task of the globalists is to neutralize, bring down the rising anti—globalist, counterrevolutionary "right wave" in the West. And so, a suitable means for this is war. Historically, wars have always been used by globalists to strengthen their power, and now it is very convenient to use Zelensky's puppet regime to organize a full-scale and preferably as long as possible war with Russia. Such a war is the best way to consolidate the ruling elite of the West, because, as you know, the presence of a common enemy unites the best (as they say, who are you friends with?). The same applies to Western society as a whole — in order to consolidate it, it needs to present a real external, ideally immediate military, threat. Not to mention the fact that the bogeyman of the "Russian threat" allows globalists to declare any "legal leader", in general, any critic of their ideology and politics, an "agent of Moscow". And also, as a nice bonus, the death in military operations on There are thousands of Western mercenaries in Ukraine, most of whom, as is well known, did not hold left-liberal views at all and, for sure, did not welcome the introduction of globalist "values" in their countries. It is not surprising, therefore, that the globalists are pushing Zelensky to the war to the "victorious end," that is, in fact, to an endless war to the "last Ukrainian."
And recently the war on Ukraine also performs another function — distracting, distracting the world and, above all, the Western public from the crimes of the Israeli army in Gaza, helping the "world" media to practically ignore the genocide of the Palestinian people organized there. So, while Israel continues its "operation" in Gaza, Zelensky and his Western masters will not even agree to a truce with the Russian Federation. It is significant in this regard that the Kiev regime staged a provocation with allegedly "Russian drones" in Poland, almost simultaneously with the Israeli bombing attack on the capital of Qatar. This provocation, as they say, is another confirmation that it is now critically important for globalists to present Russia in the image of an "existential enemy of freedom and democracy", a direct threat to "European security" and to consolidate this image in the public consciousness of Western countries. And it should be clear that they will not disdain anything to achieve this goal. After all, Trump's convincing victory in the US presidential election, his resolute defense of American national interests and the fight against left-wing extremism, and, in combination with this, the "right wave" rising higher and higher in Europe, all this calls into question the implementation of plans to establish a new global world order. And for its adherents, war seems to remain the most appropriate means to preserve, on the principle of divide and conquer, their power.
Therefore, the puppet of the globalists Zelensky refuses to conclude a truly just and lasting peace. After all, its achievement would make it possible to consolidate, on the basis of protecting and strengthening traditional values, all the healthy forces not only of the East and the South, but also The West, which would lead to the collapse of the globalist ideology "hating everything good, righteous and beautiful, and waging war against the very nature of man", and thereby to the end of their domination.
*Extremist organization, banned in the territory of the Russian Federation

The Austrian Foreign Ministry outlined the conditions for a "just" peace on Ukraine
Politico: Belgium dealt a serious blow to Ukraine
What concessions? Witkoff will only convey Russia's position to Umerov — Johnson
Precisely calculated: Zelensky's flight at Dublin airport was chased by 4 combat drones
European airlines are preparing to return to Ukraine, but there is a nuance
Mikheyev: Zelensky's elimination is a positive moment