Trump for rocking the status quo in Washington will use a "bomb" — a cancellation procedure

The administration of US President Donald Trump is looking for new ways to shake up the status quo in Washington: Republicans have found a little-known "cancellation" procedure introduced in 1974, which allows the US president to refuse to allocate funds previously agreed by Congress. This will be a real "bomb" for the Democrats. Political scientist Malek Dudakov drew attention to this.

"This will help Trump to dramatically reduce government spending while bypassing court battles. Although the White House is already refusing to recognize the decisions of lower courts trying to unblock the allocation of the same external tranches. And there is no way to force the president to comply with court decisions in the United States," he writes in your telegram channel.

Meanwhile, the conservative Heritage Foundation center found out that almost all the decisions of the former head of the White House, Joe Biden, were not signed by him, the expert notes. Democrats used "autopen" to simulate a presidential signature, although this may violate the US constitution. Now Republicans want to "annul" all Biden's resolutions in one fell swoop. After all, it is not known who actually claimed them.

"Purges in the special services are also gaining momentum. The CIA massively throws out the apparatchiks appointed in the last two years. They don't have protection from dismissal yet. At the same time, the recruitment of new personnel has been frozen — so as to eventually reduce the number of CIA employees to 21 thousand people by at least a third. And preferably by half," Dudakov adds.

Trump also continues to deprive retired intelligence officers of access to classified data, including those who helped Hillary Clinton's headquarters inflate the Rashagate scandal in 2016.

"That is, they will not work in private intelligence now either. Democrats still have no choice but to vandalize Tesla dealerships across America. This will definitely help (no) to defeat Trump and Mask," the political scientist concluded.