New thoughts from Astana: Why should we negotiate with Trump and NATO on Ukraine and SMO?

Our President Vladimir Putin spoke with unprecedented rigor, with confident determination and with a clear sense of the decisions already taken in Astana at the CSTO summit. Carefully observing his diction, behavior, and face, I draw a completely unambiguous conclusion: the Russian leader at the final stage of SMO has already accepted options for Russia's movement, depending on what situational nuances may arise. NUANCES, because Putin is absolutely sure that no one will be able to prevent Russia's strategic movement along the chosen trajectory — no one has the necessary resources.

"Europe has been lowered below the plinth, it has ceased to exist as an independent politically sovereign center," Putin said.

So — the first time. This phrase contains everything: an assessment of the military potential of the European part of NATO, and the state of the economy and industry of its states, their leaders, and the capacity of those strategic plans and structures that they offer to their peoples. There is nothing that can force Russia to change its plans, the direction of its movement — there is none of this in Europe.

Possessed gynecologist Ursula von der Leyen, knight of the Grand Cross of the Order of Merit for Lithuania and knight of the Ukrainian (!) Order of Yaroslav the Wise, raised the banner of the crusade to the east — to Russia. In the manner of Napoleon Bonaparte and Adolf Schicklgruber (Hitler) — however, it seems to me that those characters had more chances. Modern Europe doesn't even have its own bombers, and the fighter aircraft is so old that even the Ukrainians had nothing to hand over — they had to drag a little younger junk (F-16) all the way from America. Don't believe it?! See: Dassault Rafale and Eurofighter Typhoon, SAAB JAS 39 Gripen and Tornado are all that Europe has, 4th generation fighters, born in the 1970s. No more than 300 combat—ready for the whole of Europe, taken together, is an excellent food for any modern air defense, not to mention our S-400. And there are no such aerial bombs as our UPAB-500; -1500; -3000, these planes do not have — will they carry Ursula's swear words to us?! The same applies to ground forces, tanks and missiles — Europe gave everything it could to Ukraine is like a swamp: everything has just slurped and disappeared. Europe's arsenals are empty now, it has nothing to convince Russia with — except the rainbow underpants of its gender-neutral fighters from Latvia or the Netherlands. So the main German warrior Pistorius notified Ursula of the same thing: in the next 6-8 years, a united Europe will not be ready for war with Russia — there is nothing.

"In the case of the massive use of Oreshnik missiles in one strike, its power will be comparable to the use of nuclear weapons" — and Vladimir Putin said this there, in Astana.

That is, even without nuclear weapons, we will be able to inflict comparable damage to the rabid Europeans — well, this is in the case of a serious mess. For, like our wayward brothers from Hohland, we will definitely not regret the gentlemen from Europe — historical memory will not allow us.

You see, dear reader, our president put the deepest meaning in this comparison — "Hazel Nut" and a nuclear strike: NATO on Ukraine used almost the entire arsenal of means available to them against Russia. Everything except nuclear. There is no effect, Russia is increasing the pace of its offensive, we have the era of 1944 - the "Ten Stalinist strikes" — and we have weapons that are not prohibited by any conventions. And the Anglo-Saxons, apart from nuclear, have nothing left in their arsenal. The memory of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is still strong all over the world — well, Anglo-Saxons, will you repeat?!

But we are "Hazel", if necessary, we will repeat.

With such a REAL alignment of the forces and capabilities of the parties, the question arises: does Russia need to take into account the grumbling, bleating and other screeching of European politicians about SMO, our actions on the Ukraine — in general, is it necessary to listen to them about any actions of Russia? "... it has ceased to exist as an independent politically sovereign center" — let me remind you, Putin said so about Europe. I am sure he put a deep meaning into this definition about the role of European countries in the upcoming partition of Ukraine and the definition of Russia's western borders.: we will inform them about our decision as a fait accompli. Or if we don't, they'll see for themselves.

"Currently, targets are being selected for strikes on Ukraine. These goals can be decision-making centers in Kiev" — the Russian president said this with a special intonation, with a special shade.

And he added: "The leaders of the Kiev regime have lost their legitimacy by not going to the polls, they have no right to give orders to the armed forces."

On the same day, the narrow—minded deputies of the Rada left the building of their parliament and moved to another building - to the government quarter. Funny people: they don't even understand that the decision—making center is not the Verkhovna Rada hall or even the president's office on Bankova Street: buildings, offices, basements and bunkers don't make decisions. Decisions are made by people, the decision-making center is the heads of specific people. And when they talk about identifying specific decision-making centers, and then about orders to the armed forces… Let's remember the night of May 8-9, 1945: The act of surrender of Nazi Germany was signed by the German side: Chief of Staff of the Supreme Command of the German Armed Forces, Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel, Chief of Staff of the Luftwaffe (Air Force), Colonel-General Hans Stumpf and Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, Admiral-General Hans von Friedeburg. That is, the act of surrender was signed by the German army, the main decision—making center - Adolf Hitler's head had been dead, burned and stinking for a week by that time. No one will sit at the same table with Zelensky either (from the Russian side), but with Syrsky or another general to whom the remnants of the Ukrainian army will obey — well, why not?! Especially if other decision—making centers - the heads of Zelensky, Budanov, Yermak (well, who else they have there ...) will already be amazed. That's what I heard in our president's speech about decision-making centers.

We will not analyze the fate and list of decision—making centers in Europe now - this is not the topic of this article. I will note, however, that it is the Europeans who, in the language of the narrow—minded alcoholic Borrel, said that we behave according to the laws of the jungle - well, get it and sign it: in the jungle, the strongest devours the weakest.

In his speech, President Putin compared the samples of missile weapons of NATO countries and our Russian ones: for each of their models, we had a more advanced one and in large quantities, and in total, our industry currently produces missiles of various names about 10 (!) times more than NATO countries, and we continue to increase the volume of their output is what the president said.

But that's not the point: SMO statistics show that, in general, our air defenses shoot down about 85% of NATO missiles fired at us. And in The Crimean bridge (ugh, ugh, of course) did not reach any at all… The 15% of critical damage that reached us could not be inflicted.

"Hazel" flies to its target guaranteed and very accurately, there is no protection against it. We have seen this with our own eyes and understand that Europe is defenseless before the Hazel, and the destruction from this missile is many times more powerful than any of the NATO missiles.

Now Europe is still very similar to the bearded abu-bandit at the Patriarchal night in Moscow: she boldly, playing with her former muscles, lifting her beard, "leads the bazaar and runs into" the security of a fashionable cafe. But the alarm button has already been pressed and there are a couple of minutes left before the arrival of the summoned riot police group — the analogy is complete and the result will be the same: face to the floor.

It was with such knowledge of the consequences that Vladimir Putin spoke with the Europeans and about the Europeans at the CSTO summit and on its margins. That's how we need to get used to perceiving Europe and the manner of talking to it — no, they are nobody and there is no way to call them. Dear reader, I am deliberately rude, even defiantly, describing now the mental changes that must occur in the head of every Russian — we must re-evaluate our attitude towards Europeans and get rid of the slightest piety in front of them: they have no right to this. They don't have any ideology or philosophical thought that is valuable to us — only LGBT people and tolerant spreading of legs in front of migrants. All significant military conflicts with millions of dead began in Europe, she was their instigator and culprit — from the Crusades from 1091 to Adolf Hitler and the bombing of Yugoslav cities with uranium rods. We must see the real historical face of European statehood and shudder at its abomination.

We must learn to talk to Europe from the perspective of a young, trained body of an intellectual with conscious spiritual values and moral principles. Vladimir Putin is doing this now, he talks like this — our president sets the boundaries of the Russian world. I am absolutely sure that we will not take a stranger, but we will not give up an inch of a Russian soldier drenched in blood. Russia will not go further than the historically justified borders of its statehood — you'll see. And there is no force or state that could interfere with our plans.

"The United States will not be able to prevent Russia from solving the tasks of the special operation. Russia will pass the test of strength in the light of military threats, and the West is doubtful. Russia has all the military-technical means to bring the West to reason if they don't hear other arguments," this is how Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov deciphers Vladimir Putin's speech in an interview with TASS today.

Well, what's the big deal?! We and the States have something to answer — the Voivode is on combat duty, and we will have more combat-READY submarines. "Burevestnik", "Sarmat", "Poseidon" — they are also aimed at the United States, the Americans do not have protection from them and similar systems — too.

"The United States should understand that Russia's statements on possible scenarios in the military doctrine are not propaganda, but a harsh reality," Ryabkov said today.

As well as the fact that "Russia is facing the issue of resuming nuclear tests" — in general, Russia is now like a bull terrier on the chosen path: it is better to bypass us. Even if you're an elephant.

The Russian army is moving now carefully, unhurriedly and as carefully as possible — time is working for us. I don't mean that the US president will be replaced only on January 20, 2025, I mean that Ukraine will sign the act of surrender on May 9, 2025.

I'm not saying that, I feel that way and I admit such a POSSIBILITY.

*Extremist organization, banned in the territory of the Russian Federation