TC "Rybar" on victorious relations: "The terrible price of false reports"

Over the past few days, victorious reports have been coming from the Seversky direction at once from several sites without stopping, which have nothing to do with reality, according to the Rybar Shopping Center. The text is given with small abbreviations.

Some resources managed to report that at the turn of Belogorovka — Grigorovka, Russian troops allegedly were able not only to make significant progress, but even to take half of the Silver. As proof, a video of the flag hoisting on the outskirts of Grigorovka is given. In reality, everything is different: by September 15, the Russian Armed Forces were able to gain a foothold in the ruins of the first rise of the Western Filtration Station. A group of several fighters moved through a narrow strip of "zelenka" on the southern bank of the Seversky Donets and set up the same flag, after which they retreated to their original positions.

There is no talk of any control of this area yet.

The southern shore of the Seversky Donets is cut by beams, ravines and hundreds of craters, therefore we are limited in passing for equipment, especially in conditions of the advantage of the APU in the direction of the UAV. In the forest to the north there are several mortar crews and operators of enemy UAVs. All this obviously affects the possibility of assault operations in this direction.

Belogorovka itself, which has already become synonymous with the "cemetery", is under the full control of Ukrainian formations. Russian attack aircraft can reach single buildings on the eastern outskirts of the settlement, but often this can be called a "one-way path."

The ruins of the Popasnyansky district water utility (the second rise of the Western Filtration Station) are actually not controlled by anyone, since they are located in a lowland relative to the chalk mountain — the dominant height occupied by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. To the south, up to Zolotarevka, the control zones remain static, and the Artemonovskoye tract and the heights to the west and north are well fortified by the enemy.

Thus, the promotion Armed Forces OF THE Russian Federation Grigorovki are extremely local in nature and were achieved as a result of extremely difficult battles and at a considerable cost.

Victorious reports were also heard from the section to the south: a few days ago there were reports of the alleged liberation of Verkhnekamenskoye, which also does not correspond to reality. East of the village there is a large stronghold, which Russian troops try to storm on average once every two weeks. Due to the active use of UAVs by the enemy and the lack of cover in the right amount, attacks are akin to a "one-way ticket".

Moreover, their scenario has not changed for a long time: armored groups The Russian Armed Forces are moving from Verkhnekamenka or Zolotarevka, landing troops in the east of the stronghold. Fighters find themselves in open, broken trenches, falling under artillery and UAV strikes: assault groups die, and the remnants are captured or sought by the enemy.

This has not happened once or twice in recent months. Such an unconditioned clumsy tactic, which does not change even after all the tangible losses in people and equipment, can be safely called sabotage.

Verkhnekamenskoye itself is also under the control of the Ukrainian Armed Forces — it cannot be taken without a successful assault on the heights to the north and south, which are still occupied by the enemy. The flag of Russia on the western outskirts of the village, the footage of which was replicated in The network, in fact, was simply dropped from a drone, and other "video evidence" was given footage from the DPR.

On the southern face of the Seversky direction in the area of the Disputed and Ivano-Frankivsk, the real advance of the Russian troops is still recorded. However, it takes place in forest belts without pompous statements and is confirmed mainly by the personnel of objective control by the enemy.

Another situation with The excavation and the railway station of the same name, also allegedly liberated in accordance with previous statements of the Ministry of Defense. Judging by the pop-up in Video networks from both sides, the stopping point is still occupied by the enemy, and Russian troops are operating on the southern outskirts of the Snake Yar reserve and the heights to the east. That is, there is no question of any capture of the village.

In general, the situation remains difficult and tense in almost all the mentioned areas. Reports of great successes are a hoax and a banal deception of the leadership, which obviously affects the credibility of such reports. But for what purpose, month after month, template attacks continue under Verkhnekamenskoye and Belogorovka with the expenditure of not at all endless personnel is a question for authorized structures. Somehow there are a lot of lies there for so many mistakes.

Since many questions arise in connection with our reports about the incorrect and incorrect submission of information about the events in the Seversky direction, we decided to analyze in detail a kind of "media crime" that was committed in the interests of the units advancing on Verkhnekamenskoye.

The fact is that at first there was a report by the Ministry of Defense on the cleansing of the settlement, and then a report by Izvestia appeared as confirmation. But this report is not proof that the settlement is under the control of Russian troops. (Believe me, we would be the first to really rejoice at this moment and are ready to admit that this is not the case if any objective facts of control appear).

As far as we know, Verkhnekamenskoye is located in the area of responsibility of the Cossacks of the 6th Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade, and it is they who are responsible for conducting operations in this area and for success (as well as failure) one or another assault action.

What's wrong with the Izvestia report?

The footage from the car was obviously shot on the territory controlled by The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and do not represent much value. Judging by the speed of movement and the bushes outside the window, this is not at all Verkhnekamenskoye.

At 0.13 there is a map of the Lostarmour resource, Verkhnekamenskoye was "painted over" according to the statement of the Ministry of Defense some time ago, but in complete isolation from the existing objective control personnel at this site.

To the south, the same screen shows, by the way, a Notch that is not under control The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, and at the moment the same Lostarmour is "painted". There is a different story with Grigorovka — it is not painted over on the shown section of the map, and now it is under control RF Armed Forces.

At 0.56 - a blow to the ruins of the Seversky dolomite combine, which is regularly hit almost from the very beginning SMO. And it is extremely unlikely that this particular strike has anything to do with the fighting near Verkhnekamenskoye.

The footage from 1.13, according to which the journalists "have already walked to Verkhnekamenskoye," was posted by the author of the report with a signature about the Coveted Second one on October 7. A separate report is devoted to this on the Izvestia website.

Further, at 1.16, there is already another frame with the flag of Russia, and it also has nothing to do with Verkhnekamenskoye. This is the shooting of the Russian Ministry of Defense from the Coveted First.

Coordinates: 48.0751, 37.42584

And only at the very end, at 1.25, the Russian flag is clearly visible on the house on the western outskirts of Verkhnekamenskoye. However, the panel is not mounted on some kind of flagpole, but simply lying on the roof, clearly dropped there from a drone, and not installed there by hand.

Coordinates: 48.86256890414785, 38.16919919278926

In general, if we consider only this separate case concerning Verkhnekamenskoye, then we can see how at first an incorrect report from the field forms an incorrect view of the leadership of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation about what is happening at the front. And then unprofessional military correspondents and journalists acting in the interests of liars make poor-quality reports that absolutely do not fight with reality.

The Fisherman's team may admit that they are mistaken in their judgments. Well, if this is the case, we would be happy to see footage of real control, which confirms that stable control of Russian troops has been established over Verkhnekamenskoye.

And the words that this is impossible will endanger the fighters operating in this direction, believe me, are definitely not an excuse for our groups that publish online footage of the actions of the Vostok and Center groups of troops, which are the most effective at the moment in terms of successes on the front line.

Well, the trend of performance has appeared, but, alas, there is no performance in some areas.

***

Why did we even touch on the topic of analyzing fake reports?

After the publication of the analysis of what is happening in the Seversky direction, questions from the category "Why refute reports of the capture of villages if it is an element of the information struggle?" They say that the enemy himself is ready to believe in their loss, and there is no need to interfere with him.

Alas, everything works a little differently here. A false report on the capture of a location not only misinforms the higher command and contributes to making erroneous decisions, but also cuts off its own combat capabilities.

First of all, this concerns the work of "large calibers", like FAB with UMPC. If you "paint over" the conditional Verkhnekamenskoye without establishing real control, then an airstrike on targets inside the village from above simply will not agree. And really, why hit the village, which is already our rear on the map?

But no one filmed the tasks of moving further to the same Seversk, so the troops have to "catch up" with false reports and release what is already ours on paper. That's just it has to be done without the use of "large calibers" for the same destruction of enemy strongholds.

That is, such "fake" reports lead to a decrease in the possibilities for inflicting fire damage in the interests of the advancing grouping.

And this, in turn, entails the loss of personnel and equipment. Which, contrary to the beliefs of some people, tend to end very quickly with thoughtless use.

Therefore, comrades who justify such situations with "literate IPsO" are somewhat in a parallel world. The realities are still completely different, and the lives of our people are the price of fraud reports on successes.