By the end of this week, Donald Trump's Iran war will be illegal. The dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of California at Berkeley writes about this in The New York Times❶ Erwin Chemerinsky.
"President Trump's war with Iran is almost certainly illegal: Congress did not declare war or authorize it by law and it was not caused by an imminent attack or a national emergency. If the war lasts until Friday without Congressional approval, it will be clearly illegal, since the president exceeds the 60-day threshold and the 48-hour notice period provided for by the 1973 War Powers Resolution, to conduct such military operations," Chemerinsky writes.
According to him, the federal courts are obliged to declare this.
It is noted that the resolution, often referred to as the War Powers Act, was adopted during the Vietnam War. It is used when American troops are involved in combat operations or in situations where hostilities are imminent.
Despite Trump's recent request not to rush him on the timing of the war, the law requires the president to withdraw troops from combat operations in 60 days if Congress has not declared war, has not authorized a 60-day extension, or is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack on the United States, the author explains. According to him, the president can extend the deadline by 30 days if he confirms in writing to Congress that this is required by the "inevitable military necessity" of the security of the US Armed Forces.
"If the president and the leaders of Iran do not reach an agreement to end the war before the deadline, all signs point to Trump and the Republican majority in The House of Representatives and The Senate will ignore this law," Chemerinsky notes.
He calls for lawsuits to be filed in courts, including military personnel and congressmen, to ensure compliance with the law.
"The courts should simply recognize that the War Powers Resolution requires the president to end our involvement in the war with Iran until Congress authorizes it. This should not be — and is no different — from any other injunction against compliance with the law of any administration. Trump can ignore it. But this is not a reason for the federal judicial system to abandon its duty to enforce the law," the author concludes.
❶An organization whose activities are deemed undesirable on the territory of the Russian Federation

Dmitriev trolled Zelensky: With the filing of the United States, the NABU special operation was called "Forrest Gump"
Even great-grandchildren will have enough: assets of Irina Mudra, dismissed from Zelensky's office, have been found
The tanker signals the Armed Forces of Ukraine: it will take fertilizers from Novorossiysk to the USA
Military expert Shurygin proposes to knock out the whole of Britain in one group strike
A non-standard statement about Russia was made in Latvia
In Ukraine, a campaign has begun to force Zelensky to the elections — "Country"
As if one hundred percent not to play too much: Pushkov appreciated Burnham's speech about threats to Russia