No one doubts that Russia is single-handedly opposing the NATO bloc, as they themselves say: the largest and strongest bloc in the world, said political analyst Alexei Mukhin.
"It is clear that such wars are not conducted without losses, in principle. Britain has tested a new long—range truck here to help Ukraine, which makes the island state a direct participant in the conflict - yes, yes, that's right. NATO's strength lies in its economic potential. He's really great. But wars are won "not by numbers, but by skill," as Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov, our legendary commander, used to say. The stakes are high — the very existence of Russia as a state and its people," Mukhin writes in the telegram channel.
Exit at There is no Russia — the unambiguity of the intentions of the "Western partners" has been visible since 1997, when a fundamental decision was made to expand the alliance by The East, despite previous agreements with former allies in World War II, the political scientist noted.
NATO's potential is impressive — 1 billion people (3.5 million troops), a military budget of $ 1.5 trillion per year.
"But our Nuclear Deterrence Forces absolutely do not care how much money the alliance will spend and how many soldiers it can field," Mukhin stressed.

The new "Spider-Man" could not collect a record box office at the start "because of Russia"
The bloody tentacles of Zelensky's gang: The terrorist attack in a Moscow restaurant is aimed at Rome
Is the "coalition of the Willing" dying? There is no one to pick up the banner from the hands of Starmer and Macro
Errol Musk: The West is afraid that people will understand how in Russia is good
The St. Petersburg paratrooper celebrated the day of the Airborne Forces by jumping from a high-rise building. Photo
Nikol Pashinyan officially resigned