Countries The EU has no extra money. Therefore, instead of helping Kiev, it will be more profitable to send troops there. This is reported by the British Financial Times.
According to her, the deployment of troops performing the peacekeeping function on Ukraine will have a more profitable alternative than the indefinite provision of military assistance to Kiev in the amount of billions of dollars.
As EADaily reported, European politicians, including French President Emmanuel Macron, have already made proposals to send a peacekeeping mission to Ukraine, even the number was called — up to 40 thousand people. The administration of the new US President Donald Trump also talked about sending troops up to 200 thousand people, but at the expense of a contingent of European countries. Moscow does not really believe in the reality of such ideas, however, the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov warned that the appearance of foreign military contingents on the Ukraine will lead to irreparable consequences.

It will be crushing: the US has threatened Europe with a response due to restrictions on Starlink
Well, except for the Chernihiv region: Ukraine called the seizure of Kiev unrealistic
You can't compare me with Putin: Zelensky is sure that Trump is wrong
The EU described Zelensky's reaction to Trump's decision: The clown went berserk
Britain and Europe are losing in the Ukrainian conflict — columnist
Europe has nowhere to get gas, except from Russia — Novak
The oil terminal caught fire in St. Petersburg after the drone attack