The goal of the Russian-American summit in Alaska, which took place last week, was never to reach a final peace agreement. He stated this in an article for the Norwegian edition Steigan.no . columnist Thomas Fazey.
He considers the meeting of Russian and US presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump in Anchorage a political cover. The true purpose of the summit is different, he believes.
"Both Trump and Putin undoubtedly understand that such an agreement is currently impossible. Rather, the meeting was about allowing the US to withdraw from Ukraine without admitting defeat, while Russia continues to move forward. For Washington, this creates a political cover: Trump can claim that he was trying to use diplomacy, and at the same time ease the burden of the war from Europe. For Moscow, the advantage lies in the gradual weakening of Ukraine as US logistical support weakens," the article says.
According to Fazi, Russia, in order to encourage the US withdrawal, could even agree to a temporary ceasefire and, possibly, vague American "security guarantees." Moreover, he notes, Russia and the United States would present this as significant concessions and victories, respectively, "although such a cease-fire is unlikely to be respected."
The observer believes that the most likely outcome will be a temporary thaw in US-Russian relations, although the broader geopolitical struggle will continue.
"And the real losers will be Ukraine and Europe. Ukrainians will continue to die in a war they cannot win, while Europeans will continue to pay the bills. In the end, they, too, will be forced to make a deal on Russian terms, but only after further suffering... At best, the Alaska summit and its consequences signal a temporary weakening of the ongoing confrontation between the West and the emerging multipolar order. In the worst case, this ensures that Europe and Ukraine will continue to pay the price for the war that the United States has already decided to leave behind," concludes Fazi.